Background
Guidewire helps P&C insurers run and grow their businesses. Today’s claims teams face growing pressure to reduce costs, improve accuracy, and enhance the customer experience.
<10% have automated claims today, though >50% want it within 3 years
1 in 3 customers leave after a poor claims experience
CSAT drops 29 points when an adjuster is involved
Objective
Business Outcome
Achieved a ↑ 25-35% Increase in the ability to fully automate certain claims processes, a ↑ 15% improvement in data accuracy, and a ↑ 20+ point increase in user satisfaction scores.
The Solution
Claims Intake Designer enables business users at insurance companies to design and deploy Claims Intake experiences without coding. It provides pre-built metadata question sets and a drag-and-drop interface to create adaptive workflows where each question depends on the previous response.
The tool generates a runtime UI for policyholders and integrates with Claims Autopilot, structuring collected data into a payload for automated processing
Design Approach
Conduct quantitative research
I interviewed claims managers at mid-sized insurers to understand how they create and manage the Claims Intake experience. The goal was to uncover:Key phases in building an auto claims intake
Time required to complete the process
Personas involved at each phases of the process
Mapped out As-is vs. To-be flows:
I mapped the as-is journey, which revealed a heavily IT dependent process: Initial setup led by business users, Implementation and post-implementation handled by IT and engineering.To envision a better experience, I created a to-be flow—highlighting tasks that could shift from IT to business users with the right tools, reducing delays and increasing efficiency.
Conducted Competitive Analysis
I drew inspiration from both insurance and non-insurance solutions for a wide range of ideasRan a Working session
with PMs and devs to align on opportunities and validate feasibility.Created a series of low-fi mocks
And iterated through feedback cycles with PMs, engineers, and designers.Conducted usability study and synthesis
where I recognize users struggled with navigation, terminology, and rule setup. We prioritized improving node behavior, UI clarity, and accessibility, with quick wins in navigation and terminology